link to Home Page

ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for November 24, 2012

My question regards the surprise resignation of CIA chief Petraeus.  Is it truly a matter of having an affair to end the service of a man who has served his country for so many years?  Is there more involved?  Any relation to the pending announcement? [and from another] Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has demoted the former head of U.S. Africa Command who was accused of spending thousands of dollars on lavish travel and other unauthorized expenses. The demotion came after retired Army Gen. David Petraeus resigned as CIA director because of an extramarital affair and Marine Gen. John Allen was being investigated for potentially improper communications with a woman. [and from another] 5 US generals reprimanded or investigated in past 2 weeks. CIA Director David Petraeus, the former four-star general and top commander in Afghanistan, resigned as spy chief after the FBI uncovered evidence that he was having an extramarital affair with his biographer, Paula Broadwell.  Ward, former head of U.S. Africa Command, was demoted and ordered to repay more than $82,000 for inappropriate and lavish spending on travel.  Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair is facing multiple sexual misconduct charges, including forcible sodomy, involving five women, including female officers who served with him. Gen. John Allen, top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, is under investigation for potentially inappropriate communications with Florida socialite Jill Kelley. Adm. James Stavridis, Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, was cautioned by Navy Secretary Ray Mabus to exercise better oversight of his staff after an investigation into travel and expense questions, including a trip to a wine dinner in France.

If the DIA and the CIA were the primary source of the 3% fighting to keep the cover-up in place, what might they be planning to unseat Obama? Petraeus and Allen were both among the top brass working to keep the cover-up, and trying to embarrass Obama. When Libya erupted, the embassy attack, it was at the hand of Israel who hoped to make Romney look strong, Obama a failure in the Middle East. But al Queda was an opportunist and mustered a stronger attack against the Libyan embassy, and this fact was kept from the White House by Petraeus, though his excuse is that he was keeping covert operations secret. How else were Rice and the initial briefing of the Congressional committee ignorant of the fact?

Petraeus hoped to make the Obama administration look inept, and the truth is only now coming out. Thus as soon as Obama had won the election, those within the administration who knew this approached him about replacing Petraeus, with the information they had in hand for some time – the affair. This is obviously not an accident, as these two generals are in powerful positions and the planned announcement ran amuck of the cover-up crowd, of which the DIA is a player. Petraeus was forced to resign, though Obama feigned reluctance. The FBI was instructed to involve Allen, as his flirtations were likewise known. Both these men have now been removed from power, and others within the military wanting to block Obama’s announcement have gotten the message.

The plan in midsummer was to put those who were aggressively carrying out the Reagan Executive Orders for secrecy on the approach of Planet X via assassination under house arrest until after the announcement. But how does one do this to the Director of the CIA or someone as powerful as General Allen, currently under consideration for promotion to a yet more powerful position?  House arrest was not possible, but removing them from power and diminishing their status within the military is possible.  Three other generals were added to the mix – Sinclair, Stavridis, and Ward – all prosecuted almost simultaneously though their offenses were known for months or even years. The 3% are being warned.

Now the Obama administration has won a second term what is going through their heads in relation to the announcement?  With all the major obstacles dealt with prior to the election are they ready to try again or are they going to wait until after Xmas in the New Year?  With the Mayan date close by do they want to wait until this has passed so the populace do not link this false end of the world date and Planet X together and panic or do they perhaps want to do it this year so people make an association between the two and start thinking about the end of the world and consider that the calendar is a bit of out sync and therefore start to think that the passing will be more extreme than what the announcement implies (assuming the announcement does not mention a Pole Shift as an outcome)? [and from another] A central tenet of the Muslim faith is the future coming of Imam Mahdi or the Imam at the end of time. He is also known as Q'aim or the promised one. Mahmoud Armhedhinajad is a firm believer in the imminent arrival of Imam Mahdi. Almost every one of his major speeches make references to the Mahdi and has even said that he expects his arrival within a matter of a few years.

Will the supposed end of the Mayan Calendar on December 21, 2012 create a conflict for the planned announcement of the presence of Planet X by Obama? This was always a concern, but the visibility of the Planet X complex in the skies and the increasing Earth wobble has pressed the establishment to make this announcement as soon as possible. It matters not if the announcement comes before or after the December date, as the connection will be made by some in the public. The connection will also be made to Biblical talk of the End Times, the Rapture about to happen, the Antichrist about to emerge, and a final battle about to erupt in the Middle East. Muslims would look for their Madhi to arrive.

The announcement also runs amuck of all the cover-up excuses that have been used – Global Warming, Solar Flares, Quad Poles on the Sun, a skewed Galactic Plane, various comets such as Elenin, or earthquakes caused by HAARP. None of these have any basis in fact but will continue to be argued with even more vehemence after the announcement as the real cause of the Earth changes, because those who promulgated these lies don’t want egg on their faces. It will even be claimed that the real cause of the Earth changes – Planet X – is itself a lie.

The press to finally explain to the public why the Earth has a wobble, erratic weather, increasing earthquakes, and bright orbs around the Sun has not gone away. Those perpetuating the cover-up concluded that unless they explain, the public will realize the truth on their own and blame the government for the cover-up. If they tell the truth, they stand a chance of being one of the good guys, rather than one of the bad guys perpetrating a cover-up and withholding information. There is frankly no way to avoid the circus that is about to ensue, though the announcement by NASA is planning to include mention that Planet X has been in the inner solar system for years, and is moving slowly, to counter the expectation by some that something dramatic is to happen on December 21, 2012.

The supposed end of the Mayan Calendar was, as we have explained, incorrectly determined. It was the basis of a plethora of books making profits, even though meticulous avoidance of a passing planet as the cause was the norm. The authors did not want the harassment that ZetaTalk received for telling the truth. Thus there is little nexus between the pending announcement by Obama and the end of the Mayan Calendar, though many wanting the stage will attempt to make that nexus. Prophets of every color will try to grab the stage. The circus is about to begin and there is no avoiding it.

With the upcoming visit by President Obama to Myanmar to meet with Aung San Suu Kyi who is one of the most compassionate leaders of any country, and following the full eclipse tomorrow in Australia, it appears that this could be a synergistic moment for disclosure. There are so many major quakes in Myanmar and I assume that his visit is going to focus on the upcoming events, could the Zetas ascertain whether there is a coincidence in this coming meeting? [and from another] As President Barack Obama prepared Sunday to become the first U.S. president to visit Burma, he defended his decision to make such a historic trip even as deadly ethnic violence continues in the country long viewed as a pariah state. Human rights groups have argued that Obama’s trip comes before Burma’s regime has undertaken sufficient reforms to justify such a visit. The president landed here Sunday to begin a four-day Asia trip on which he’s set to make history by becoming the first U.S. president to visit Burma. The trip to Thailand, Burma and Cambodia had the potential to be a post-election, international victory lap for Obama.

Why did Obama chose to go to Myanmar, Thailand, and Cambodia when his schedule is crowded with the Fiscal Cliff and he is planning to restart the announcement process? He feels he must personally warn them about his upcoming announcement. Cambodia is where the East Asia summit is to take place, so all the countries on the Sunda Plate will be available. But why Myanmar and Thailand? They form the coastline across from Bangladesh and India, which are sinking. Already there are tensions between Myanmar and Bangladesh land. What will happen when a frantic populace from Bangladesh and India try to migrate in earnest?

Indonesia has sought to explain the sinking in its lands with a rain excuse, and when that failed, with claims of water extraction from the ground causing subsidence.  Malaysia is murdering their buoy maintenance men to keep the cover-up going. What will they all do when the truth explodes in the press?  Obama has explained that the US cannot be viewed as a haven for those displaced by the flooding, as it will have its hands full when the New Madrid adjusts and the Aftertime flooding arrives. Asia must look to its own, though it clearly has scarce resources.

Where the conference is billed as an economic summit to counter China’s influence, there is an obvious conflict in that China has land that could absorb drowning refugees from Asia, as does Australia and New Zealand. Australia has punished those attempting to immigrate, and New Zealand closed its borders firmly as has China. Africa is poor and will be above the waves that will engulf much of the world eventually, and has yet to be explored as to its willingness to partner with countries in Asia. At the very least, Obama is planning to tell Asia to brace for the announcement and its likely impact on the plans of its peoples.

The Zetas have stated that the announcement will not be made until after the election. While the public vote will be known this week, the actual vote that elects the President isn't until December 17 when the Electoral College registers their official vote. Is it possible that due to a potential "rigging" of the Electoral vote that the announcement may not come until after December 17?

Given that Focus Groups assembled to test the likely public reaction to Obama’s public announcement indicated disbelief, is there any concern in the Obama administration that restarting the announcement shortly after the election, and before the official Electoral College vote on December 17, might cause the college to declare him “crazy” and not fit to be President? In that NASA’s role is to present the factual portion of the announcement, why can’t they go first? If there are any glitches in the system to prevent Obama’s announcement from streaming to the public, the glitch would hit NASA’s presentation, and spare Obama embarrassment. This is the current plan.

We have seen a rapid decrease in the buoys now reporting near Australia.  A quick glance today at indicates that only four of the eleven buoys are now operational, two northwest of Australia and two south of New Zealand.  All other buoys around New Guinea have been taken offline.  The two buoys southwest of Thailand in the Bay of Bengal are not in tsunami event mode, yet reflect missing information.  Also, north of New Guinea toward Japan numerous other buoys are no longer relaying information. Might the Zetas confirm if TPTB are taking these monitors offline, or if they are truly becoming non-operational due to the ocean conditions where they are sited.

There has been a steady pattern whereby government provided information sources that show the visible presence of the Planet X complex, or the twisting of the magnetosphere, or earthquake prevalence and force, or any other means by which the public can plot or prove that the government have been lying be removed from public view. This happened early when the magnetic simulator located in Japan was closed down, supposedly for lack of funds. An alternate simulator is now in operation, which is more difficult for the public to read and understand.

SOHO has periodically been taken down ostensibly for maintenance but it was deemed that removing this facility permanently would raise too many question, so the SOHO was always returned to operation. Earthquakes have long been skewed on the charts, so they are at least a magnitude lower on average than their true magnitude.

Buoys have proven to be an embarrassment, in that they show the ocean floor rising or falling, and in accordance with our predictions. The death of a Malay buoy maintenance man recently, to silence him, was considered a red flag, so buoys are not being taken out of service when they are flagging plate movement. Being taken out of service does not mean they are no longer operational, it simply means the public cannot be privy to the information. One can read past the outages to see where plate movement is occurring, thus. Just look for the newly deactivated buoys, and draw your own conclusions!

Please tell us about the discovery "for the history books" that NASA's Mars rover Curiosity recently made. [and from another] Mars Mystery: Has Curiosity Rover Made Big Discovery? The discovery was made by Curiosity's Sample Analysis at Mars instrument. SAM is the rover's onboard chemistry lab, and it's capable of identifying organic compounds — the carbon-containing building blocks of life as we know it. The $2.5 billion Curiosity rover landed inside Mars' huge Gale Crater on Aug. 5, kicking off a two-year mission to determine if Mars has ever been capable of supporting microbial life. In addition to analyzing soil samples, SAM also takes the measure of Red Planet air. Many scientists are keen to see if Curiosity detects any methane, which is produced by many lifeforms here on Earth. A SAM analysis of Curiosity's first few sniffs found no definitive trace of the gas in the Martian atmosphere, but the rover will keep looking. the news will come out at the fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union, which takes place Dec. 3-7 in San Francisco.

NASA is obviously creeping closer to announcing life on Mars, which is patently obvious given the live mouse recently captured on film. Why now? For decades Hoagland has tried to get NASA to film the Face on Mars with more detail, while NASA has studiously avoided that part of Mars on their flyover missions. When evidence of dust covered city streets, roads, and irrigation ditches show up, NASA falls silent. Now that the high definition Curiosity is roving about, and the results released to the public almost directly, even more has become evident. The Annunaki were there, Mars sustained life such as herds of goats and sheep, and sustains life still.

The cover-up over the presence of Planet X is collapsing. The cover-up over the presence of alien life, intelligent life other than mankind, has proved burdensome. Having lied for decades, it is hard to come clean. Roswell happened, and Skinny Bob was the survivor. Pilots and astronauts have seen and filmed UFOs regularly. Why not just say it? They would prefer to avoid the sharp slap of anger and disgust from the public, would prefer to ease into so as to dilute the public’s anger.  They will say that Mars sustained life in the past, hinting that such life bearing planets may exist elsewhere in the Universe. Meanwhile, the public is meeting with the visitors on spaceships in increasing numbers, two billion and rising as of last count, leaving the cover-up muttering in their cups at geophysical conferences.

The head-honcho of Catholicism etc, Joseph Ratzinger aka Pope Benedict XV1, has apparently released a book , in which he is publicly casting doubt on the accuracy of the purported year in which Jesus died, and thus also the accuracy of the christian calender itself, claiming it to be up to 7 years out. Mr Ratzinger aka the Pope stating: "The entire christian calender is based on a miscalculation". Of course this is nothing new, however, it is the source and timing of this being trumpeted on the web, in the mainstream, which makes this notable. Many have cocked a suspicious eyebrow at this, it being, most suspicious. Perhaps this is a little obvious, but, would the Z care to enlighten us re this? Is this an Establishment attempt to befuddle the Common Man, re when to expect the coming Cataclysms aka Pole Shift? [and from another] The Pope Says The Entire Christian Calendar Is Wrong. Nov. 21, 2012. The assertion that the Christian calendar is based on a false premise is not new – many historians believe that Christ was born sometime between 7BC and 2BC. John Barton, Professor of the Interpretation of the Holy Scripture at Oriel College, Oxford University, said most academics agreed with the Pope that the Christian calendar was wrong and that Jesus was born several years earlier than commonly thought, probably between 6BC and 4BC. [and from another] 2012 Mayan apocalypse calculation might be off. October 19, 2010. The accepted conversions of dates from Mayan to the modern calendar may be off by as much as 50 or 100 years. That would throw the supposed and overhyped 2012 apocalypse off by decades and cast into doubt the dates of historical Mayan events.

If the doubts about the date of the birth of Jesus have been known for years, why is the Pope waiting until a month prior to the supposed end of the Mayan Calendar to make his official announcement? He is casting doubts on many aspects of the myths surrounding the birth of Jesus too. Question what your experts tell you, seems to be the message. That the December 21, 2012 date for the end of the Mayan Calendar is subject to debate is also nothing new. As we have stated, it is wrong. This too is likely to get more press as the date approaches, because those who have used this 2012 date to placate the public’s anxieties about End of the World theories will need to reset.